The Abu Dhabi Family and Civil and Administrative Claims Court ordered four defendants to pay a young man an amount of 64,558 dirhams, and 20 thousand dirhams in compensation for defrauding him, and to make him believe that they are officials of a construction company, and offered him to work in the company, and obtained sums of money to complete the procedures for appointment, visa and residence. .
In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against four people, demanding that they pay an amount of 64,558 dirhams, and 25 thousand dirhams in compensation, with obligating them to pay fees and expenses, noting that the defendants defrauded his son, deluding him that they would provide him with a job in a company, and took from him. On the amount of the claim, and a penal sentence of imprisonment was issued against them.
The court stated in the merits of the ruling that it was established from the lawsuit papers and documents that the defendants were criminally convicted of fraud, as they had reached through an information technology means to seize for themselves the value of the financial sums owned by the victim, using fraudulent methods, and they communicated with him by e-mail , impersonating an incorrect name and description, that they are officials of a construction company that does not exist, and they offered him to work in the company, and made him believe that he should transfer sums of money to complete the appointment, visa and residency procedures.
The court indicated that the defendants confirmed that claim, by sending him a copy of the work contract, which led to his deception, and forced him to transfer sums of money to the defendants in installments, totaling 64,558 dirhams, through exchange companies, and the defendants received it, and they were punished by imprisonment. Each of them has a period of three years and deportation outside the country, after the execution of the penalty restricting freedom, and the penalty was amended before the Court of Appeal, with the sufficiency of imprisonment for each of them for one year, and his support for what he decreed of deportation.
The court confirmed that the act in which the defendants were convicted of seizing the money owned by the plaintiff, is the same act on which the plaintiff relied in establishing his present case. In the occurrence of the act constituting the common ground between the criminal and civil lawsuits, and in the legal description of this act and its attribution to its perpetrator, and then, in this common matter, he has the authority of the thing judged before this court.
The court ruled to obligate the defendants to jointly pay the plaintiff an amount of 64,558 dirhams, and to compel them to pay the joint plaintiff 20,000 dirhams, compensatory for the moral damages he suffered, and to oblige them to pay fees and expenses of the lawsuit, and all other requests were rejected.
Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news